Cruz: Obama’s View of Federal Power ‘Knows Virtually No Bounds’

April 10, 2013
cruzSen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) (AP photo)

( – Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) released a report documenting  attempted abuses of federal power by the Obama administration on  Tuesday, saying the administration “knows virtually no bounds.”

Cruz points to Obama’s own Supreme Court appointees, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, to make his case:

“When President Obama’s own Supreme Court nominees join their  colleagues in unanimously rejecting the Administration’s call for  broader federal power six times in just over one year, the inescapable  conclusion is that the Obama Administration’s view of federal power  knows virtually no bounds,” the senator’s report said.

The Obama administration’s over-reaching includes attempts to  electronically track Americans without cause and deny churches the right  to choose their own ministers.

Cruz, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on The  Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, said the cases “demonstrate  an astonishing view of federal power on behalf of the Obama  Administration.”

“If the Department of Justice had won these cases, the federal  government would be able to electronically track all of our movements,  fine us without a fair hearing, dictate who churches choose as  ministers, displace state laws based on the President’s whims, bring  debilitating lawsuits against individuals based on events that occurred  years ago, and destroy a person’s private property without just  compensation,” he said.

“Luckily, we do not have to live in that America,” Cruz added.

In one case, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC,  the Justice Department argued it “had the right to oversee a church’s  choosing of ministers,” which even Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan  called “amazing.”

Cruz highlights one exchange between Kagan and Leondra Kruger, a DOJ  lawyer, in which Kagan asked, “Do you believe, Ms. Kruger, that a church  has a right that’s grounded in the Free Exercise Clause and/or the  Establishment Clause to institutional autonomy with respect to its  employees?”

“We don’t see that line of church autonomy principles in the Religious Clause jurisprudence as such,” Kruger said.

Kagan, who served as Solicitor General under Obama, said it  was “amazing” that DOJ believed that “neither the Free Exercise Clause  nor the Establishment Clause has anything to say about a church’s  relationship with its own employees.”

The court went on to unanimously reject the DOJ’s claim, saying, “We  cannot accept the remarkable view that the Religion Clauses have nothing  to say about a religious organization’s freedom to select its own  ministers.”

In another case, United States v. Jones, the DOJ argued that  the federal government could attach a GPS system to a car without cause,  despite the Fourth Amendment’s restrictions on unreasonable searches  and seizures.

The DOJ said it did not constitute a search because a “GPS system is  already in public view and a person should not expect it to be  private.”  The court again unanimously rejected its claim.

“The Obama Administration, through its Department of Justice, has  repeatedly advocated a radical theory of sweeping federal power,” the report says.

Cruz said he will continue to document cases “as long as this Administration  continues seeking ways to expand its power in direct violation of  Americans’ constitutional rights.” is not funded by the government like NPR. is not funded by the government like PBS. 

  1. #1 by homepage on August 6, 2013 - 8:32 pm

    Hello to every body, it’s my first visit of this website; this blog consists of remarkable and truly good stuff for visitors.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: